Physiognomy and Subconscious Associations
Look at these faces ... try as hard as you can to just look at the facial features and ignore politics, if you can:

I think this is why I always got the impression that Stephen Harper (centre, Canadian Prime Minister-elect) was a smarmy leerer.

I think this is why I always got the impression that Stephen Harper (centre, Canadian Prime Minister-elect) was a smarmy leerer.
no subject
Well, they were all randy little buggers, weren't they?
no subject
no subject
But YEAH! It's because they're all of Irish descent.
They're eyes are all baggy, like if they hadn't slept in years. Well, I think we can all attest to what Billy and Jack were diong to all hours of the night in the oval office, but Pandora's
BoxBucket-O-Fun has already been opened, so I'll stop here! XPno subject
JFK looks like a decent guy, responsible, wants to do whats good, but not too bright (in that picture).
The guy in the middle looks very much like one of our own politicians, who I always thought looked smarmy too. Economist-type fellow, slightly boring and a bit arrogant.
Clinton looks amazingly honest and sincere for a politician. And allthough we know now that he wasn't always honest, that must have been what the voters saw in him when they elected him. (Most Norwegians miss Clinton. The relationship between the US and Norway was very strong and uncomplicated during those years.)
no subject
no subject
Me too
(Anonymous) 2006-01-26 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)A2
no subject
Well, not president, necessarily ... more Secretary In Charge of Yelling at the Television.
no subject
Over the past four year we've had to appologize to the US government on several occations, and all that time we had a conservative government. Now we have a socialist one again, a coallision, and the latest chapter was when one of our ministers managed to squeek out that we ought to boicot Israel (her party - which is not big - supports Palistine). Goodness grief! It was all they talked about in the news for the next two weeks. (And we did appologize to both Israel and the US.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2006-01-27 02:49 am (UTC)(link)Democrats in general, on the other hand, absolutely adore him and think George W. Bush is the spawn of Satan.
I don't subscribe to either party, so I really don't have an opinion.
no subject
no subject
I used this to prove that Bill Clinton was the best president ever because he successfully tapped into that collective view of what a president ought to be. And if he was with the majority view on that, odds were he'd be a good representative of majority interests the rest of the time.
Um, which is all a way of saying that men who leer lewdly are probably more likely to become president or PM, I think. :D
no subject
no subject
Harper actually started out as being about as far right as a legitimate Canadian politician can get – approximately a moderate Republican, by American standards. Dunno if he's actually gravitated more centre since the two conservative parties merged, or if it was just campaign rhetoric. We'll see.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm glad the similarity is visible to more than just Ubiquitouspitt and I; I was starting to worry we were both delusional. Maybe it's an art thang.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2006-01-27 07:32 am (UTC)(link)---DisneyBoy
no subject
no subject