Drawing 24 and Relationship Terminology
Mar. 24th, 2009 07:51 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I might have posted this one before, but when I uploaded it to Photobucket, it didn't give it a different filename, so bombs away!

Heeheehee.
On a slightly related note: I have been a stranger to the dating scene for most of my life, but thought I'd learned the basics in high school where I was designated counselor for all my friends and their woeful dramas. However, I have recently discovered that the world of human relationships is even more fraught and imbued with baffling subtext than I'd feared, and even the supposedly harmless world of terminology has layers and layers of hidden meanings. I had thought that any couple who were dating were 'boyfriend and girlfriend' but I now learn that only applies to a serious, committed relationship, one level down from engagement. It's become impossible to talk about anyone's relationship to anyone else because I never know what to call them, for fear of misrepresenting their status and starting who knows what. So I ask you, oh knowledgeable internet, what terms to use when defining the following sorts of couples. Both verbs, for defining their state, and nouns defining one or the other member of the party (to replace 'girl/boyfriend'), are welcome. Smart-aleck answers from the religious right are not helpful.
1. Just starting to go out but not serious yet, sort of testing the water
2. Have been together for a few months but have not declared any sort of committment
3. Testing the water but also having sex
4. Long-term non-committed but having sex*
5. Long-term committed but not having sex
*and I don't mean 'f—buddies,' I need a term that can be used in polite company if that's possible

On a slightly related note: I have been a stranger to the dating scene for most of my life, but thought I'd learned the basics in high school where I was designated counselor for all my friends and their woeful dramas. However, I have recently discovered that the world of human relationships is even more fraught and imbued with baffling subtext than I'd feared, and even the supposedly harmless world of terminology has layers and layers of hidden meanings. I had thought that any couple who were dating were 'boyfriend and girlfriend' but I now learn that only applies to a serious, committed relationship, one level down from engagement. It's become impossible to talk about anyone's relationship to anyone else because I never know what to call them, for fear of misrepresenting their status and starting who knows what. So I ask you, oh knowledgeable internet, what terms to use when defining the following sorts of couples. Both verbs, for defining their state, and nouns defining one or the other member of the party (to replace 'girl/boyfriend'), are welcome. Smart-aleck answers from the religious right are not helpful.
1. Just starting to go out but not serious yet, sort of testing the water
2. Have been together for a few months but have not declared any sort of committment
3. Testing the water but also having sex
4. Long-term non-committed but having sex*
5. Long-term committed but not having sex
*and I don't mean 'f—buddies,' I need a term that can be used in polite company if that's possible
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:23 pm (UTC)1. Just starting to go out but not serious yet, sort of testing the water---> "TALKING"--basically casual dating and making out.
2. Have been together for a few months but have not declared any sort of commitment---> "DATING"
3. Testing the water but also having sex ---> "HOOKING UP".
4. Long-term non-committed but having sex ---> Um, who does this? Okay. Hrm. I'd say 'hooking up', but just clarify that it's a...frequent...thing? Eesh.
5. Long-term committed but not having sex ---> "TOGETHER" or "GOING OUT".
Hope that was helpful! :)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:29 pm (UTC)Some people seem inseparable, but do not have any romantic chemistry they want to own up to. Those would be "other halves."
I would also refer to 2 and 5 as "The other voice in their head." They communicate and relate as if they are together, but don't want to be seen as together.
...But, honestly? I'd just call them boyfriend/girlfriend until the parties in question correct you. Obviously they're sending the wrong signals and need to clarify their relationship.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:34 pm (UTC)I like that 'his girl/her boy' thing, how delightfully 1940s. I think I shall use that from now on. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:45 pm (UTC)5. Long-term committed but not having sex ---> "PARENTS".
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:50 pm (UTC)Alternatively, my boyfriend and I have started referring to each other as "Super Girlfriend" and "Super Boyfriend." It tends to elevate such a simple term.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:53 pm (UTC)I tend to just use "significant other," or "husband/wife" if they appear to be joined at the hip anyway.
Good luck probing these waters!
Date: 2009-03-24 03:54 pm (UTC)Not something I've had much experience with myself (I swear!), but my best friend is in a super-long-term "relationship" along those lines. Honestly, eventually you stop referring to it at all, because everyone already knows what you're talking about and it gets too awkward.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 04:20 pm (UTC)Then I find myself happy to be out of the dating pool :P
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 04:21 pm (UTC)Can you tell that I like to simplify everything?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 04:37 pm (UTC)So true...so true...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 06:45 pm (UTC)2. boyfriend, girlfriend
3.
4. Friends with benefits.
5. partners
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 06:56 pm (UTC)I.E. "How are things with that guy you've been seeing?" OR "Oh, I just saw that girl you've been seeing recently. Did she take you out to lunch?"
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 07:18 pm (UTC)California is weird. Hooray for bitter winds, long winters, tiny states, and the Puritan legacy.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 07:35 pm (UTC)Among my group of fellow teenagers, I really only hear "boyfriend/girlfriend." When a relationship is starting it's usually "the guy/girl you're interested in/have a crush on/are stalking," until the person corrects you with whatever the correct term is.
I've heard the other phrases from the skankbags I refuse to associate with, so I'm not sure exactly what they mean by "this guy I'm seeing now." I presume that to mean "this guy I'm having sex with now," but I don't know for sure. *rolls eyes* Kids these days.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 08:03 pm (UTC)2. dating, his/her date for the evening
3. still dating, though it gets sketchy on that
4. well, fuck-buddies is the preferred term, but 'friends with benefits' works as well, as does 'seeing each other' if in polite company that wouldn't particularly care for the innuendo
5. married.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 08:31 pm (UTC)It doesn't necessarily indicate inevitable engagement – in fact I hear it most confidently used in reference to couples who probably never plan on getting married but basically are, already, without the paperwork (living together, etc). Perhaps I should go edit that to take out the implication of a timeline...
I'm glad to know I'm not the only one out of the loop, and that someone actually in a youthful peer group is similarly confused. I'm used to being out of touch with popular culture but I had thought this was more or less straightforward...