The Rhineland Massacres

Sep. 26th, 2025 09:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

After Peter the Hermit gathered his followers in Cologne, Germany, on Holy Saturday in 1096 (12 April), they prepared to go south and eventually toward the Holy Land as part of the First Crusade. (Technically, at this stage they were not part of the army called by Pope Urban II, and have been referred to as the People's Crusade.)

This was tens of thousands of peasants in a poorly organized militia, moving through unfamiliar territory with the noble goal of doing something "Christian"; unfortunately, this mood of theirs made them see any non-Christian as a target.

This anti-non-Christian mindset motivated them to attack Jews. There were some specific factors we might consider. One was the need for money: they were peasants, and travel expenses (food, shelter) were beyond their meager personal means. Thousands of people crossing unfamiliar land was always stressful for the natives. Jews were a popular source of quick funds by simply stealing from them or even killing them.

Also, to the Christian citizens of France and Germany, Jews were responsible for the Crucifixion of Christ, and so clearly were the enemy of Christians. This was the beginning of "Crusade fever" that inspired anti-Jewish violence for the next couple centuries at least.

Another factor was the presence of Count Emicho of Leiningen. While Peter's people were likely to threaten Jews in the towns through which they passed, bribes of money smoothed this over and people were usually unharmed. He joined Peter the Hermit and brought along his own history of attacking Jews. Emicho shortly before all this was known to attack Jews and force conversions on them.

Peter supposedly carried with him a letter from the Jews of France requesting of the Jews of the Rhineland that they support the Crusade. A Jewish chronicler of the mid-12th century, in the Solomon bar Simson Chronicle, records that Peter's arrival caused such fear in a town that the Jews readily supplied him with his needs.

Jewish communities in Mainz, Speyer, and Worms were ransacked before the Crusaders moved on. These three prominent populations of Jews banded together to enact a series of rules and policies concerning interactions between Jews and Gentiles. We may continue Peter the Hermit's People's Crusade a little later, but first let's take a look at the Enactments of SHU"M.

Peter the Hermit

Sep. 25th, 2025 07:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

After the announcement of the First Crusade, a French Roman Catholic priest from Amiens named Pierre took it upon himself to preach the Crusade around the countryside. He chose to go about in a long coarse robe, forsaking shoes and hat. Riding a donkey, he preached all over Italy. Outside Italy, he preached around Huy in Lower Lotharingia. In fact, tradition in Huy says he was there when the word came (not at Clermont for the announcement, as some historians reported), and immediately started preaching to anyone who would listen of the need to join up.

His mother's name was Alide Montaigu, so he may have been related—albeit distantly—to the Counts of Montaigou. He certainly traveled with Count Conon on the Crusade itself, as seen in yesterday's post.

He tried to get to Jerusalem on his own, not waiting for the Crusading army called by Pope Urban II. He persuaded thousands of lower-class folk to follow him to the Holy Land. The result was thousands of  unskilled men and women with little means to pay their way across Europe (and some knights as well). This "pre-Crusade" is known as the People's Crusade, as I explained 13 years ago.

Why did many thousands of poorer people join? Millenarianism, the belief that the Year 1000 could bring the Apocalypse, may have been a concern for people who wanted to expiate their sins with a grand gesture. There had been a recent outbreak of ergot poisoning that seemed like an end-time sign. Sights in the sky recently—a meteor shower, a lunar eclipse, the Aurora Borealis, a comet—also created fear.

Peter claimed a divine mandate from Christ to preach the Crusade, and even claimed he had a letter to prove it. He had everyone to whom he preached agree to meet at Cologne in Germany, which they did on 12 April 1096, Holy Saturday.

Their religious fervor became indiscriminate in their choice of enemy, finding people to kill before they ever left Germany. Tomorrow we'll learn about the shameful Rhineland Massacres.

Count of Montaigou

Sep. 24th, 2025 07:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

When Huy became the first municipality north of the Alps to be granted city rights, its right to some self-governance meant Conon, Count of Montaigou, lost some of his rights over it.

Conon was connected to Huy from an early age. His parents were Gozelon of Montaigou and Ermengarde de Grandpré. Ermengarde's father was Count of Clermont, and after his death that title passed through Ermengarde to her son. Count Gozelon died in 1064, succeeded by his eldest, Conon, a couple years before Huy's city rights charter. Conon up to that time was a knight who had only appeared as witness to a few royal charters.

Records are scarce for that part of Lotharingia, but a 1 January 1071 document confirms that he was then known as Count Conon, whose liege lords were Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV and the Duke of Lower Lotharingia, Godfrey IV "The Hunchback." (Godfrey has appeared a few times in this blog, as godfather to Godfrey of Bouillon and as former husband of the widowed Matilda of Tuscany.)

Conon and his wife, Ida, had four sons: Gozelon, Lambert, Henry, and Theobald. Theobald died young. Henry became an archdeacon and provost. Lambert became count of Montaigou and Clermont after his father's death. Gozelon's fate? You'll see shortly.

Conon was one of the nobles who agreed to the Treuga Dei, the Truce of God. Conon loved justice. When Bishop Otbert of Liège tried to depose Abbot Theodoric II of the monastery of Saint Hubert, Conon supported Theodoric.

When the First Crusade came along, Conon went along with his two eldest sons under Godfrey of Bouillon's banner. Among the first to arrive at Constantinople, Conon was one of the men negotiating with the representative of Emperor Alexios I. Gozelon died before reaching Jerusalem, but Conon and Lambert fought in Jerusalem and lived.

While Conon was returning home (a legend says) with Peter the Hermit and some men of Huy, a storm endangered their ship. They prayed that they would build a church if they survived, at which the storm immediately subsided. Conon and Peter founded the Augustinian canonry of Neufmoustier in Huy, where (according to tradition), Peter lived until his death in 1115 and was buried there. It was said that if you could not make it to Jerusalem after vowing to go, a pilgrimage to the abbey was sufficient to fulfill the vow. (Some of the ruins are shown above.)

Conon himself died on 1 May 1106, succeeded by Lambert, who lived at least until 1140.

Peter the Hermit, although he has cropped up in a few blog posts over the years, has never been fully discussed. Let's resolve that next time.

Wildlife Sketches

Sep. 24th, 2025 12:48 am
[syndicated profile] andreasdeja_feed

Posted by Andreas Deja

Now that the weather in Southern California is getting cooler it is time to return to the zoo and sketch!

Here are drawings from a sketchbook dating back a few years. Most of them were done from life, some of them from wildlife documentaries.  As I said before, if you are a newcomer to drawing animals, it is essential to start drawing them from real life. Spending time in front of animals and observing them is the only way to get started.  

But since you don't get wild animal behavior at the zoo, it is equally important to then study footage of wildlife. Freeze individual frames, analyze the motion and pick a frame that informs you about the animal's character. 

Like Eric Larson said, for an artist one of the most important things is: Observation!





















The First City

Sep. 23rd, 2025 11:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

If you saw yesterday's post on city rights, you might wonder: if they weren't already, when was the first "city" thought of as such? Wasn't Rome already a city?

Well yes, cities existed before the Middle Ages. In the growing feudalism north of the Alps, however, a powerful noble claimed control over all the lands he could conquer, or that he was given by a higher-ranking noble. Giving up that power wasn't common. When a municipality proved itself to be especially valuable, however, they might be allowed some self-governance. The first such place north of the Alps was Huy, from Latin Hoius vicus, "Hoyoux village." 

It had an ideal location, at the mouth of the River Hoyoux where it joined the larger River Meuse, making transportation of goods easy. From the original Roman camp, it was evangelized by St. Domitian, the "Apostle of the Meuse Valley," in the 6th century. Legend says he delivered the area from the ravages of a dragon.

Huy also became known for tanning, woodworking, and wine, making it one of the most prosperous cities along the river. When the local office of bishop became a prince of the Holy Roman Empire in 985, Huy and the area around it became its own county, with a count appointed by the bishop to administer it.

By this time it already had a market; we know this because records of King Childeric III in 743 gave an exemption to some monks from the toll paid on goods sold at the market. (That was kind of Childeric, since these tolls—essentially a sales tax—provided a healthy source of revenue for royal coffers.) Revenues from Huy were sufficient that King Lothair II in 862 diverted some to the double monastery of Stavelot-Malmedy. In 890 its status was upgraded with the construction of a fortress on a hill. (The illustration shows the castle as it appeared c.1600.)

We don't know what the tipping point was. It was overseen by a series of counts, but under Count Conon in 1066 it was granted the first known city rights charter north of the Alps.

Huy was one of the areas Peter the Hermit wandered through to drum up support for the First Crusade and the People's Crusade. The textile industry was an enormous source of its power and revenue in the 13th and 14th centuries.

One of its strengths—its strategic position on the rivers—made it a target during the wars of Louis XIV, and it suffered so much that the residents dismantled the castle themselves in 1715 to eliminate its military value. A modern citadel exists on the hill now.

When power transfers hands, someone suffers. What was Count Conon like, and was it difficult for him to have such a gem removed from his governance? Let's take a look at this obscure Count of Montaigu tomorrow.

City Rights

Sep. 22nd, 2025 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Yesterday's post mentioned the town of Saint-Omer being granted city rights after becoming commercially powerful, but what did that mean? City rights were a status used in the Low Countries and the German nations attached to the Holy Roman Empire.

A town gained city rights as a reward for proving itself valuable enough to its liege lord that it was worth it to the lord to reward them with privileges that were not otherwise available to other municipalities. It could also be offered to a municipality in exchange for money when the lord was financially needy. It created better good will when the lord needed money than a surprise tax would.

The illustration shows the charter granting rights to the city of Flensburg in the extreme north of Germany. City rights could be a financial advantage, because it allowed the city to create revenue streams of its own such as:

  • The rights to hold a market, which brought several sellers together on certain days, prompting buyers to congregate in the city. The city could charge the sellers a fee for being a part of the market.
  • They might also be able to charge tolls on roads that pass through the town; there might be few roads in the area suitable for wagons, for instance. 
  • The city could also charges its citizens for taxes.
  • One large potential benefit as if they were granted a staple right; that is, the right to be the exclusive source in the art to produce and trade particular goods.
  • They could also gain the right to build defensive walls, mint their own coinage, and the citizens could have a certain amount of freedom of mobility (the ability to move from job to job, for instance).
  • Governance was a big issue. City Rights could grant the ability to create local government officials who could legislate locally and prosecute within their boundaries.

The first town to receive city rights was Huy in the province of Liège, Belgium. It, and some of its famous medieval residents, will be a discussed tomorrow.

Jafar and Scar Roughs

Sep. 21st, 2025 10:47 pm
[syndicated profile] andreasdeja_feed

Posted by Andreas Deja

My friend John Ramirez just posted on Facebook a few of my rough drawings of Jafar and Scar. I had not seen any of these since I drew them decades ago. John rough inbetweened for me way back.

In these Scar doodles I was trying to figure out the shapes and forms of his mane. Originally I had thought it might be a tough challenge to track this irregular mass of hair in drawing as well as in motion. But after analyzing this a little, the issue sort of took care of itself. 

Here is the final model sheet:

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEijO2jZKJxfNQ-GoF3nkP4T221r50UuFxOMzLHjJ8CxsFnp0_4YlH2s1Oko2vPfIzRG3YZFMkzKTTfTuKaZTsLIk4a_xL3VCMInf3wPbqK2U2dSBuu0lV0McTofQUSX_EAdb4RgauNwRGvO/s1600/DLBB+9f.jpeg






These are xeroxes of a few roughs from a scene in which Jafar is pressuring Gazeem, the thief, to find the lamp. He is actually holding that character who was animated by Dan Hofstedt on a different level. Voice actor Jonathan Freeman just nailed the personality of Jafar.






A terrific lion "figurine" I had purchased somewhere, can't remember. But it did help me to visualize a lion's anatomy.




In this scene Scar yells at Nala: "We are not going anywhere!" It almost animated itself. When you work off Jeremy Iron's voice performance, the animation comes easy, and it was a total thrill to bring Scar to life. I can't emphasize this enough. Absolute joy.





Saint-Omer

Sep. 21st, 2025 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

In researching the life of Lambert of Saint-Omer, I realized that the town after which he was named had some interesting history. The town sprang up around the Abbey of Saint Peter, founded in the 7th century by Omer (or Audomar), the bishop of Thérouanne. The abbey's name changed in honor of its second abbot, who became St. Bertin.

The abbey started as a simple small house on a hillock in a marshy area, from which Bertin would go out and preach to the pagan Morini, a coastal tribe in northern France. A converted nobleman gave to bishop Omer a tract of land called Sithiu, which Omer turned over to Bertin for the abbey. Their numbers grew, and eventually a new abbey was built on the site which became surrounded by a town named Saint-Omer. (There were a few abbeys built over the years as their numbers grew. The most recent one was ordered demolished in 1830; its ruins can be seen in the illustration.)

So near the northern coast made Saint-Omer vulnerable to Vikings, who ravaged the place in the 860s and 880s, but the town rebuilt with strong walls. Saint-Omer became part of Flanders when Arnulf of Flanders conquered the county in 932. In 1127, its importance as a commercial center (thanks to its growing textile industry) earned it the first charter in West Flanders with city rights.

Saint-Omer became part of France (again) when Philip II of France (1165 - 1223) forced Count Ferdinand of Flanders to sign the Treaty of Pont-à-Vendin. Despite this, battle over that part of France continued. Ferdinand's alliance with King John of England and Emperor Otto IV did not help, and Saint-Omer remained within French boundaries, though it continued to be a significant part of the Flanders economy. Saint-Omer did not become permanently a French town until 1678.

Besides Lambert, another famous son of Saint-Omer was Godfrey of Saint-Omer, one of the founding members of the Knights Templar. The symbol of the Templars—two men riding a single horse, representing their vow of poverty—is supposedly because the first Grand Master, Hugues de Payen, and Godfrey were so poor that the two men had to share a horse.

I mentioned above that Saint-Omer was the first in the county to gain "city rights." What did that entail? I'll tell you tomorrow.

Lambert de Saint-Omer

Sep. 20th, 2025 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Among the many people in the Middle Ages who tried to write all-encompassing works about theology and history and known things, Lambert of Saint-Omer was well-known and praised in his day but an unknown to the Modern Era.

He was born c.1060 in France and entered the Benedictine monastery of St-Bertin in France as a youth, studying the "basics" of theology, grammar, and music, before visiting other schools in France. In 1095 the monks of St.-Bertin and the canons of nearby St.-Omer voted him abbot.

An admirer created a list of Lambert's many writings, most of which are lost. They included sermons, studies on free will, original sin, the origin of the soul, and science questions.

One of his works that does survive is the Liber Floridus, or "Book of Flowers," an encyclopedic work on Biblical, chronological, astronomical, geographical, theological, philosophical, and natural history subjects. He included a list of popes, family trees, descriptions of real and imaginary animals (some of his descriptions of animals are still not identified), maps, constellations, and more. Nine manuscripts survive, most of them with illustrations. (Shown above is Lambert writing the Liber.)

His epithet of Saint-Omer is because the town that sprang up around the twin monasteries of St.-Bertin and St.-Omer became known as Saint-Omer. It had a long history that we will look at next time.

The Antichrist

Sep. 19th, 2025 10:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

The Antichrist, a charismatic person who would appear prior to the end times and become ruler of the world despite his inherent evil, was "identified" more than once in the Middle Ages.

Joachim Fiore, the "Man Who Invented the Future," declared Rome as Babylon and the pope as the Antichrist. Emperor Constantius II was declared the Antichrist in 365 because he was a semi-Arian. Constantius' response ultimately "returned the favor" by creating the first antipope. When the year 1000 was upon them, the Carolingians exhumed the body of Charlemagne, thinking they would need him to fight against the imminent appearance of the Antichrist.

Arius was called a harbinger of the Antichrist. Martin of Tours believed the world would end by 400, and stated "There is no doubt that the Antichrist has already been born. Firmly established already in his early years, he will, after reaching maturity, achieve supreme power."

The term Antichrist came from the first and second epistles of John, where it is mentioned four times and described as someone "who denies the Father and Son." Matthew and Mark each refer to a "false Christ," when Jesus advises his followers not to be deceived by false prophets who will perform "signs and wonders" and claim to be Jesus. The "beast of the sea" in the Book of Revelation is assumed to refer to the same figure.

It is from John's description of the beast that the culture assumes the specifics of the Antichrist: buying and selling will require its mark on the forehead, it will blaspheme God, rule for 42 months, and will receive a wound in the head that will miraculously heal leaving no mark. It will be supported by the Dragon.

According to the Elucidarium of Honorius Augustodunensis, the end for the Antichrist will come:

Finally he will extend his forces to conquer the righteous at the Mount of Olives and there he will be found suddenly dead by the spirit of the mouth of the Lord, that is, slain by the command of God, as the saying goes, "The Lord will destroy at his holy mountain the man renowned through the whole earth.” [link; note that the source of this "saying" has not survived to the modern era]

The Reformation was clear on the identity of the Antichrist. Luther, Calvin, Knox all saw the pope as the position that matched the Antichrist, no matter which pope sat the seat at the time.

The illustration of the Antichrist riding Leviathan is from the Liber Floridus ("Book of Flowers") by Lambert de Saint-Omer. Let's take a closer look at him and it tomorrow.

The Elucidarium, Part 3

Sep. 18th, 2025 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Book Three of the Elucidarium of Honorius Augustodunensis was called De futura vita, "Concerning future life." By "future life" he meant the afterlife.

There are seven chapters to Book Three: The Elect, The Damned, State of Souls Before the Judgement, The Antichrist, The Resurrection, The Judgement, Eternal Bliss.

It begins with an explanation of the moment of death of "The Elect"; that is, those who will go to Heaven:

Just as a bridegroom comes with a crowd of soldiers to fetch his bride and then, happily singing, leads her off, so when a righteous man comes to his end, his guardian angel comes with a crowd of angels and raises his soul, the bride of Christ, from the bodily prison and leads it into spiritual paradise and, with loud singing of the sweetest song and with bright light and the most pleasant odor, arrives at the heavenly palace.*

For those on the other end of the spectrum:

When the wicked reach their end, a great noisy throng of demons, awful to see and dreadful in their actions, comes to get them. They drive the soul from the body with terrible torment and lead it cruelly to the prisons of Hell.

Honorius describes nine tortures, and now I'm wondering if Dante got the idea of nine circles from the Elucidarium. A lot of time is spent on details of how much and how the damned will suffer. He also makes clear that no one in the afterlife who is no damned will care a bit for the suffering of those who deserve it.

The master explains how the Antichrist will come to power:

He will command the whole world and will subjugate the whole human race to himself in four ways: First, he will gain the noble by wealth, ... Second, he will subdue the common people by terror because he will rage with great savagery ... Third, he will win over the clergy by wisdom and unbelievable eloquence, ... Fourth, he will deceive those who have contempt for the world, ....

The Elucidarium became enormously popular, translated into several languages across Europe for centuries. (The illustration is the title page of a German edition.) What Honorius produced influenced the day-to-day understanding of Christianity for generations, and no doubt led to several of the common ideas people have even today about the afterlife.

The idea of the Antichrist started early in Christianity, and the Middle Ages was very wary of him, always on the lookout for whomever might be the one who subjugates the world in three and a half years and fools the faithful. Tomorrow we'll look at the evolution of this idea in the Middle Ages, and at some of the people who were accused of being the Antichrist. See you then.

*Nota bene: translated passages are from a 1979 translation made for a dissertation that can be found here.

The Kley Style

Sep. 17th, 2025 08:57 pm
[syndicated profile] andreasdeja_feed

Posted by Andreas Deja

I think many artists at one point or another study works of contemporaries or predecessors. 
A few years ago I "tried out" Heinrich Kley's style of drawing. These are just freehand doodles of my own, keeping Kley's sense for fantasy, anatomy and rendering in mind. Fun exercises. 
Who wouldn't want to have their work at least a little bit impacted by this extraordinary draughtsman?!

I even thought how much fun it would be to try and create a short film in Kley's style.....still thinking about this.


 










The Elucidarium, Part 2

Sep. 17th, 2025 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Book Two of the Elucidarium of Honorius Augustodunensis was called De regis ecclesiastics, which could be translated "On the matters of the Church." For Honorius, this was about explaining our current existence and our religious obligations. It begins by tackling the question of the source of evil and sin, since those things are in our hands:

Pupil: It is said that evil is nothing, yet if it is nothing, it seems to me a great marvel that God would damn angels or men, since they do nothing. If evil is something, then it seems to be from God, since all things come from him. It follows that God is the creator of evil and unfairly damns those who do it.

Master: Truly, all things come from God and he made all things to be very good. Therefore, evil is shown not to exist in substance. Everything which God made is substantial and all substance really is good. Evil, however, has no substance; therefore evil is nothing. What we call evil is nothing other than the absence of good, just as there is blindness when there is no sight or darkness when there is no light, even though blindness and darkness are not material.

...

Sin is nothing more than failure to do what has been commanded or doing other than that which has been commanded, just as evil is nothing more than the absence of good, that is joy. Evil has, at least, its name from God since it came about through that substance which God made. God properly damns or keeps joy from those who do not do or do otherwise than what he has commanded.

Fortunately, there are ways to be forgiven for your sin if you are truly penitent. Also, there are guardian angels:

Pupil : Do men have angels as guardians?

Master: Angels preside over each race and state, righteously dispensing and ordaining rights, laws and customs. Moreover, every spirit, when it is sent to a body, is entrusted to an angel who always urges it to do good and who reports all the spirit's works to God and the angels in heaven.

And sinners always have the opportunity for a deathbed confession and repentance, which the Master says does work.

Book Three enters the realm of Christian eschatology, what happens after death. We'll take a look at his views on the afterlife, the Antichrist, Final Judgment, and Eternity tomorrow.

*Nota bene: translated passages are from a 1979 translation made for a dissertation that can be found here.

The Elucidarium, Part 1

Sep. 16th, 2025 09:30 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Written by Honorius Augustodunensis (c.1080 - c.1140) in the late 11th century, the Elucidarium was intended to make clear various things about Christianity and mundane understanding of the world. The author would have been quite young at the time of writing, and went on to write many more works, but the Elucidarium became a well-known way to explain the world around us in the context of Christianity. We have over 300 Latin manuscripts of it, showing how popular it was. It was also translated into Old English, Provençal (although that one alters the text to make it more compatible with Catharism), and Old Icelandic (which provided influence for Snorri Sturluson's Prose Edda, which I explained a couple days ago). It was later translated into Old French, Middle High German, Middle Welsh, Czech, and others.

The format is a Socratic dialogue between a Master and Disciple, spread over three books. The three are:

1. De divinis rebus (On divine things), covering Creation, the rebellion and fall of the angels, Eden and the Fall of Man and need for redemption, and the life of Jesus.

2. De regis ecclesiastics (On the matters of the church), explains the founding of the Church when the Holy Spirit descended on the apostles during Pentecost; it explains the divine nature of Christ and the manifestation of Christ in the Eucharist.

3. De futura vita (On the future life), in which he discusses the Antichrist, the Second Coming, the Last Judgement, Purgatory, and the eternity that awaits you in either Heaven and Hell.

Honorius uses many analogies to help the reader (or listening audience) understand his concepts. For example, the Holy Trinity has three parts like the sun. The sun has fire (God), light (Son), and heat (Holy Spirit). He also describes Paul's reference to three heavens (from 2 Corinthians 12's "third heaven" comment) and explains that the first heaven is the physical one we see, the second is spiritual and where angels exist, and the third is for the Holy Trinity.

These were the kinds of explanations that comforted people, that gave them a better understanding of what was being said in the Bible, something to "hang their hat on" so to speak. Honorius goes into detail on the order of the six days of Creation, and offers a timeline for other events in Genesis. Satan (a name that never appears in the Bible) lasted not even a single hour in Heaven before thinking himself better than God and being cast down. Angels had the ability to sin because they had free will, but after the fall the good angels became even more good and lost the ability to sin. He then goes into detail about angels and devils.

For the rest of Book One, he discusses Jesus' time on Earth, his death and resurrection and ascension into Heaven, declaring that once Jesus passed the clouds his physical body transformed into a more godly form.

Tomorrow we'll look at Book Two.

Honorius Augustodunensis

Sep. 15th, 2025 09:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Yesterday I briefly mentioned the Elucidarium. Its name signified that it was intended to elucidate the details of Christian theology and its relationship to mundane folklore. Today I'll tell you about its author, and tomorrow we will look at the work itself.

The author was Honorius Augustodunensis. The surname has been questioned. Some thought he was from Autun, whose Latin name was Augustodunum, but he was as likely to be from St. Augustine's Abbey in Canterbury (where he would have known Anselm). Additionally, since he refers to contemporary events in Germany, some suggest that he could be from Augst near Basle or even Augsburg in Swabia. The Catholic Encyclopedia calls him "Honorius of Autun," despite acknowledging the German connections.

He was influenced by the writings of John Scotus Eriugena and his Division of Nature, and by Anselm of Canterbury. In fact, we can partially date its origin in the late 11th century because it refers to Anselm's Cur Deus Homo, published in 1098.

He was a monk (or hermit: he describes himself as solitarius which could mean either) who certainly spent some time in England; later in life he went to  the Scots Monastery in Regensburg, Bavaria, lending credence to the idea that he was originally German.

Honorius also imitated the style of John Scotus Eriugena, used the same definition of philosophy as Eriugena ("Philosophy is the comprehension of things visible and invisible"), wrote a summary of the first four books of Eriugena's) Division of Nature (and copied the fifth into it), and praised him highly, suggesting that he may have spent time in Ireland with the man.

Besides the Elucidarium, he wrote many other works. We believe the Elucidarium was one of his first, which means he was a very young man when he wrote it. He lived until about 1140, and his birth is estimated to have been about 1080.

He wrote a set of lessons for celebrating the Assumption of Mary, a commentary on the Psalms, a collection of his sermons (you can read one here), a commentary on the Timæus of Plato, a bibliography of Christian authors (including himself of course), and Imago Mundi ("Image of the World") that combined cosmology, geography, and a history of the world.

Tomorrow we will look at the influential Elucidarium.

Disney Roughs

Sep. 15th, 2025 01:52 am
[syndicated profile] andreasdeja_feed

Posted by Andreas Deja

There have been some beautiful rough animation drawings offered at Heritage Auctions. In about 90% of the times I am able to identify the animator. 

Here is a Captain Hook rough by Woolie Reitherman.  




This is a clean up study by Iwao Takamoto. The draughtsmanship he brought to Lady and the Tramp is unbelievable. 



An rough drawing by Milt Kahl. Alice is straightening out the neck of the flamingo.



Frank Thomas animated Hook here as he is talking to Tinker Bell. Incredible acting.




A key drawing by Eric Larson, who did not mind working off live action reference. He said that there are plenty of things that need to be changed from what you see in the photostats in order to make your scene believable. 



Frank Thomas again. Here he blocks in the best possible staging for a scene with Jock and Lady.




Woolie animated a chunk of the fighting sequence with Peter Pan and Hook. He was certainly a great action animator, but Woolie was also capable of handling great acting scenes.




John Lounsbery almost dominates the film Lady and the Tramp. He animated quite a few characters, all brilliantly. Some of his career's best work.
This is bull in the dog pound. Lounsbery also animated the policeman and the professor in front of the zoo's entrance. And of course those wonderful Italian characters Tony and Joe.







An amazing scene by Ed Aardal. So many things to control in a set up like this. The end result looks totally natural.




This is a Marc Davis scene. He definitely had the drawing as well as animation chops to handle a character with so much realism.





Charming key drawings of Merryweather by Frank Thomas.




Lovely draughtsmanship in this drawing by Ollie Johnston.




I need to look up who animated Peter here as he jumps off the bed. Perhaps Eric Larson.





The early version of Robin Hood by John Lounsbery.


 

The way Frank Thomas handled the animation of the Stepmother is still so inspiring to me. He expressed so much with often very little movement. This character was all about subtleties.



Elves

Sep. 14th, 2025 08:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

Early Anglo-Saxon texts show the Old English term ælf, which morphed into our Modern English elf. The word was cognate with the Old Icelandic alfar, and Old High German alp ("evil spirit").

Some of these earliest Anglo-Saxon references are contained in medical texts such as Bald's Leechbook, a collection of remedies. Elf influence was blamed for many otherwise unexplainable ailments, especially sudden stabbing pains that were often attributed to "elf-shot," an arrow or other projectile from an unseen elf attacker. The illustration shows the victim of "elf-shot" by demons, depicted as arrows, from the 12th-century Eadwine Psalter.

What did elves look like?  The consensus is that they looked like human beings, often depicted as very attractive physically. Interactions in folklore do not suggest that they were diminutive. They were also seen as their own race or people: the use of Old English ylfe in Beowulf is a grammatically plural ethnonym, the term for a people or tribe.

Snorri Sturluson's Prose Edda, written about 1200, even lists different elf races: he talks about svartálfar, dökkálfar and ljósálfar ("black elves," "dark elves," and "light elves"). Snorri, however, is the only source for these different species of elf, and it is thought that he was "elf-ing" (my term) the existence of dwarves, demons, and angels; trying to take some spreading Christian concepts and "paganizing" them (again, my term).

The spread of Christianity turned elves from invisible creatures living alongside humans and occasionally helping or hurting into evil forces that must be defied and destroyed. Scottish witchcraft trials frequently refer to the evil influences of elves. Eventually, the word "elf" began to be replaced by the French loan-word "fairy." Chaucer, writing in the 14th century, has Sir Thopas set out to find the elf-queen in the "countree of the Faerie." Iceland has retained some belief in alfar as we saw in yesterday's post.

I want to talk about the reference to Snorri Sturluson's "paganizing" Christian concepts that were spreading across Europe. The spread of Christianity was enhanced by a particular text created to explain it to ordinary people who had no education. It attempted to explain common folklore in the context of Christianity. This work was called the Elucidarium, and we'll open its pages tomorrow.

Icelandic Folklore

Sep. 13th, 2025 09:00 am
[syndicated profile] dailymedieval_feed

Posted by Daily Medieval

The witches of yesterday's post were just a small part of the rich folklore found in Icelandic literature and history. Because Iceland was so isolated geographically, Christianity came to it late and did not get as strong a hold on culture as in other European countries. Consequently, Iceland in modern times still retains strong vestiges (if that is not an oxymoron) of its supernatural history.

Magic (galdur or galdrar) could be good or bad and implemented through the use of galdrastafir (sigils, symbols), runes, or through words. Spells were very elaborate and well thought out. For instance, you could get a ghost under your power with a spell that caused a corpse to rise from its grave. As it did so, you had to reach down and strangle it until it asked you to stop. At that point you had a ghost under your control. You had to ask it its age, however, and if it were older than 14 or 15, you had to send it back to its grave, because a ghost older than that could be too powerful to keep under your control.*

Tales of galdrar are usually about human practitioners. Iceland is full of tales and beliefs about non-human beings. There are two terms for most of them: the older álfar (elf people) and the later term huldufólk (hidden people). These beings inhabit the land (largely) invisibly, but their dwellings (among rocks) and their well-traveled paths are known. Disturbing their homes is a grave offense, and they will seek revenge. Modern-day  Iceland will alter construction projects to avoid damaging rocks or cliffs lest the hidden folk be offended.

South of Reykjavik, in the town of Kopavogur, there is an elf hill, Álfhóll, a quite small area with some large boulders that is in an ideal spot to put a road through. Three attempts to build a road have failed.

The first effort was abandoned when funding ran out just before blasting could begin. A decade later, a second attempt was thwarted when heavy equipment and machinery repeatedly broke down without explanation. In the 1990s, a third attempt was made to remove part of the hill for road repairs, but powerful drills broke apart without even leaving a mark on the rock! [link]

Álfhóll is now considered a protected site, and the road squeezes around it.

Interactions between humans and álfar could be pleasant. The illustration is of an altar cloth in the National Museum of Iceland. This cloth was supposedly given to a human woman by an elf woman who was grateful for assistance in childbirth. It is unique as an artifact related to elf folklore.

Let's expand our look at elf people to the rest of Europe tomorrow.

*Some of what I'm sharing is from a TV series called Supernatural Iceland.

Most Popular Tags