Shrek Goes Fourth
Oct. 31st, 2007 01:21 pmUpon learning today that the newest incarnation of Dreamworks' cash cow is to be called Shrek Goes Fourth, I realized they were following the Blackadder naming convention, and the inevitable crossover followed:

The more I think about this, the more I believe it would be bad enough to be actually entertaining.
This crossover reminded me of a thing I heard on Radio 4 ... I think it was on Recorded for Training Purposes. Hollywood is all about remakes, yes? And every time a trailer runs for a remake the audience cringes at the butchery because the original was always better. So a studio catches on to this and, on the website for an atrocious remake, they solicit donations, saying if they can make up the budget of the movie they won't release it in theatres, and lo, it succeeds! This turns out to be such a profitable enterprise that they give up making real movies at all; they simply buy up the rights to old classics (Citizen Kane, It's A Wonderful Life, Thelma and Louise, etc) and shoot a trailer for a version starring Eddie Murphy and Mike Myers (doing their Shrek voices, of course), and make a fortune. They performed a number of these trailers; they were fantastic. I should have recorded it. The end.

DONKEY: Hey Shrek! I got a cunning plan!
SHREK: Tell me, Donkey ... Is it more cunning than a weasel with a doctorate in cunning from Cunning University that has just broken into the cunning reserves and eaten so much cunning that it is literally oozing out his ears?
The more I think about this, the more I believe it would be bad enough to be actually entertaining.
This crossover reminded me of a thing I heard on Radio 4 ... I think it was on Recorded for Training Purposes. Hollywood is all about remakes, yes? And every time a trailer runs for a remake the audience cringes at the butchery because the original was always better. So a studio catches on to this and, on the website for an atrocious remake, they solicit donations, saying if they can make up the budget of the movie they won't release it in theatres, and lo, it succeeds! This turns out to be such a profitable enterprise that they give up making real movies at all; they simply buy up the rights to old classics (Citizen Kane, It's A Wonderful Life, Thelma and Louise, etc) and shoot a trailer for a version starring Eddie Murphy and Mike Myers (doing their Shrek voices, of course), and make a fortune. They performed a number of these trailers; they were fantastic. I should have recorded it. The end.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 08:39 pm (UTC)"Shrek V" will be next because all the cool kids know that Roman Numerals are the shit. '__'
The drawing is great though. :D
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 09:11 pm (UTC)There's got to be some kind of prize for that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 10:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 12:00 am (UTC)At least this crossover fanart makes up for it. =D
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 11:08 am (UTC)But the news of a fourth movie creeps me out enough :P
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 11:35 am (UTC)Seriously, though, Shrek Goes Fourth?!
Dreamworks intern: "I want to see how a Shrek sequel is made so badly!"
Producer: "Well, you've come to the right place, Bob. A Shrek sequel hasn't been made this badly since ... the previous one, actually."
(no subject)
From:Fourth Shrek
Date: 2007-11-01 04:10 pm (UTC)I am not familiar with BlackAdder but the drawing and your script are hilarious.
That theory about remakes extortions actually is pretty good. It would be a great way to wean Hollywood off of their lack of originality. Now if there were only a way to reduce the amount of slasher porn and teenage sex comedies...?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 10:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 04:31 pm (UTC)Shrek Goes Fourth is a crap idea. The third was bad enough.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 12:05 am (UTC)