I hadn't posted a review because I didn't really have much to say that half the people on my friends list haven't said already: it's good, go see it. It was selling out, here, its opening weekend, so it didn't seem to need my help. But I thought perhaps someone might be curious what I thought of it (after all, you are reading my blog) so I shall say this:
How refreshing! The art direction had a lot of integrity and ingenuity, was imaginative and bold, and weird to see 'blog style' actually in something, more or less unadulterated. The 3D was quite good, I thought, and authentic, probably because they were photographing an actual 3D set as opposed to pushing pixels. The story ... worked ... but I have always had problems with Neil Gaiman and most of my dissatisfaction with this movie stems from the same thing that leaves me dissatisfied with nearly everything else he does.* It's not that I have problems with it so much as it could just ... be ... better. And no, I haven't read the book. The animation was good if a little over-animated at times (argh 'Meet Wybie' sequence argh) and it was amusing to hear Keith David's voice coming from a cat. All in all, though: QUALITY. The end.
*Except Good Omens, for the most part, which ... I mean, TERRY PRATCHETT. Come on.
How refreshing! The art direction had a lot of integrity and ingenuity, was imaginative and bold, and weird to see 'blog style' actually in something, more or less unadulterated. The 3D was quite good, I thought, and authentic, probably because they were photographing an actual 3D set as opposed to pushing pixels. The story ... worked ... but I have always had problems with Neil Gaiman and most of my dissatisfaction with this movie stems from the same thing that leaves me dissatisfied with nearly everything else he does.* It's not that I have problems with it so much as it could just ... be ... better. And no, I haven't read the book. The animation was good if a little over-animated at times (argh 'Meet Wybie' sequence argh) and it was amusing to hear Keith David's voice coming from a cat. All in all, though: QUALITY. The end.
*Except Good Omens, for the most part, which ... I mean, TERRY PRATCHETT. Come on.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 05:05 am (UTC)Curious though, any thoughts on Margrat Garlik? It's been a while since I've read the witch books, but she stood out as a contrast to his usual hard/strong lead women. Don't know if she ever counted as a lead woman, but still. The bit about her and Verence and the fake mustaches always tickles me. I'm in general agreement with your sum up of Pratchett's male and female characters, especially with Polly.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 05:47 am (UTC)