Punctuality
May. 3rd, 2005 12:14 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm not going to wait forever like I did with A Series of Unfortunate Events or Phantom – here's what I thought of Hitchhiker's Guide, which I just saw:
It's bedtime. If I stay up any later I'll really start to believe it's Friday and that's just asking for trouble.
· Overall, I got the same impression from the movie as I did from any of the books (I admit) I listened to at work, and that is a general feeling of a bunch of really great ideas, often absurdly funny, all sort of loosely strung together by some entertaining characters and/or caricatures. This is entertaining – often thoroughly so – but not exactly transportive. Not exactly overflowing with dramatic tension, sort of thing.
· Some lucky production designer had a lot of fun.
· Arthur was great. Ford was great, to my relief. Zaphod was great. Didn't like Trillian's acting much.
· Thanks to whoever's responsible for keeping as much of the text as possible, as well as the little asides like the falling whale and (if you stayed through the credits) the invading spacefleet and the dog. Much as with the Snicket books, that's where a great deal of the charm lies, for me.
· There was a bit of pacing wobble... lots of the beginning seemed a little slow and distracted to me. Why sit there moping about Trisha and having all these flashbacks that aren't really amusing or revelatory to any important aspect of the plot when the planet is about to be destroyed? It would have been one thing if Ford was really rushing Arthur and Arthur lollygagged in his own misery, but Ford just sat there listening to him; there was no real sense of urgency beyond that which anyone in the audience would naturally assume when someone says, quite calmly, that the world will end in 12 minutes. Anyway, that's the specific example... It started to roll along a lot better about halfway through, like the editor had got the hang of it or something.
· The main character in a Hollywood action-adventure blockbuster was reading a book in the corner at a party. I somehow feel ... vindicated. Even though it was a fancy dress party, which I suspect I might enjoy for about ten minutes longer than I do a regular party, but I haven't been able to test this theory as they don't seem to EXIST on this continent! But that's a tangent.
It's bedtime. If I stay up any later I'll really start to believe it's Friday and that's just asking for trouble.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 01:29 pm (UTC)But you can't have a movie nowadays without some good and solid angst; I was just relieved that the movie exceeded my standards for decency, you know? Having heard so much bad about it beforehand.
And I agree — the little sort of Easter Egg-y bits did so much for me, and for the rest of the audience, I'm sure. The laughing was near nonstop, although my poor ESL father was pretty bewildered. xD;
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 03:52 pm (UTC)I first saw your HP page in ah.. 2002, and for no particular reason decided I'd revisit it today. My personal favourite, as of today, is Boggart-Snape.
Anyway, I've just friended you and thought I'd drop a line.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 07:33 pm (UTC)I beg to differ...
Date: 2005-05-04 02:53 am (UTC)but I can tell you that the MOST unfunny movie (as it cannot possibly be called a "film") ever made is a little ditty called "Young Einstein" which was written and directed by and stared Mr. Yahoo Serious.
I have never before nor ever since, EVER, walked out on a movie. I walked out of this one. And I was a kid.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:40 am (UTC)phantom review
Date: 2005-05-04 12:03 am (UTC)And by the way, can I ask what exactly 'lent' was? I know that it was when you drew stuff, but can you explain a bit? Thanks.
p.s. your 'how to draw' page has helped me a lot. i've made my own style and i've really improved. thank you :)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 12:34 am (UTC)Lent is the forty days before Easter during which adherents to certain sects of Christianity practise self-denial, discipline, and charity. The most stereotypical but generally understandable example is giving up chocolate. Nothing in scripture says "thou shalt not eat chocolate for forty days before Easter" but chocolate is the sort of addictive luxury that is good to give up for a while, teaching you to resist temptation and, if you give the money you save on your pound-a-day chocolate addiction to the poor, charity as well. I dedicated myself to drawing a page in my sketchbook every day because I don't draw in it enough, especially during periods of employment, and practising a little self-discipline never goes amiss. I posted them up here because if there was no one to hold me to task but myself, I'd find it far easier to back out. Even though it was an entirely artificial obligation.