Crisis of Succession
May. 15th, 2007 11:51 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, Jerry Falwell is dead. Who will step up to replace him as the laughable yet infuriating spokesman of radical right-wing Evangelical Christianity? How will we know which children's television characters are gay? I feel so lost!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 11:49 pm (UTC)... shuns him out of embaressment. He does more damage than good to the image of evangelicals.
I can respect people with different political opinions than mine; what bothered me most about Mr Falwell was that his misrepresentation of the Christian philosophy made me embarrassed to admit my allegiance to it in mixed company. Unfortunately, there are plenty of people to continue his legacy of bigotry and hatred, and I'm sure they'll get just as much attention.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 01:30 am (UTC)I guess to many serious evangelical Christians my reluctance to own up to my religion at every opportunity is probably a serious sin. For the moment I hope that "they will know we are Christians by our love" might suffice in lieu of actively evangelizing since "Go and make disciples of all the nations" is one of my biggest philosophical problems with Christianity at the moment.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 11:15 pm (UTC)He certainly had quotable slices of hate. Dead or not, what goes around comes around.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 03:11 am (UTC)Free speech, I see, is less important than letting someone with a Cult of Personality take precedence over the thousands of people who die far worse deaths every day.
I have said nothing directly against him and you have attacked both me and my mode of thinking based on an icon I used on someone's journal. A picture. On the internet.
If this isn't the lowest form of pathetic argumentation, I don't know what is. Go start a flamewar thread on Fark if you're this hard up for a good fight.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 03:22 am (UTC)You apparently have never read Wodehouse--those books are nothing but pure farce and bad behavior. Throwing dinner rolls at the ceiling fan and knocking off policemen's helmets don't exactly constitute an excellent set of manners.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 03:41 am (UTC)And, because the coward who is inept at arguing likes to take refuge in tiny inconsequential details, he did accuse Spongebob Squarepants and his starfish friend of homosexuality as well. I don't recall if he ever mentioned Bugs Bunny's recurring transvestite seduction of Elmer Fudd, though. Seems a rather conspicuous oversight.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 08:48 am (UTC)OK...Spongebob, he's as bent as...very bent thing, Tinky Winky, obviously, uh, all the puppets on Rainbow...and Mr. Ratburn from Arthur.
So it's ok, in the light of this tragic event, we can still rail against beloved children's television and if we run out, I'm sure I can make up, I mean, expose some others.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 02:24 pm (UTC)Thank you, I feel so much more anchored now.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:24 am (UTC)